CORNHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. L. & B. ASSENHEIM.

(1937) 58 Ll.L.Rep. 27

KING'S BENCH DIVISION.

Before Mr. Justice MacKinnon.

Motor insurance-Non-disclosure-Claim by plaintiff insurance company for a declaration that they were entitled to avoid a policy issued to defendants- Evidence that defendants, insured in respect of two Studebaker lorries with other insurers, had later insured a Chevrolet lorry with plaintiffs; that subsequently the other insurers had written to defendants' brokers informing them that they would not invite renewal of the policy in respect of the Studebaker lorries; and that the two Studebaker lorries were then insured with plaintiffs-Conflict of evidence as to whether plaintiffs were informed by defendants' brokers that the other insurers had refused to renew-Road Traffic Act, 1934, Sect. 10.