i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

RETHINKING THE SIGNATURE RULE

Sandra Annette Booysen*

Als Memasa v UBS
Just months after endorsing the caveat emptor principle,1 the Singapore Court of Appeal appears to be striking a new balance. In the recent case of Als Memasa v UBS AG,2 the court said that the time may have come to review whether unsophisticated bank customers, who have signed terms they do not understand, should be bound by clauses which excuse misconduct or negligence on the part of the bank.
The background to the case is significant, as economies and courts continue to deal with the fallout from the 2007–2008 global financial crisis. The particular facts of the case are also important. The customers were a wealthy father and his daughter. The father was 95 years old; his daughter was in her sixties. Both were unfamiliar with the English language. They sued the defendant bank, UBS, after the bank liquidated their holdings to meet margin calls following disastrous investments in complex financial products. The statement of claim was poorly particularised and was struck out by an assistant registrar.


LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY

22

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.