i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

DOCUMENTARY CREDITS: ANOTHER ORIGINAL STORY

Crédit Industriel et Commercial v. China Merchants Bank
When is a document an “original”? The answer would appear obvious: “when it is not a copy”. However, in the context of documentary credits it seems that the answer is not so obvious; and, as Sir Thomas Bingham, M.R., has observed, “…there is abundant room to debate what, in the context of modern technology, is an original”.1 At issue is the proper interpretation of the International Chamber of Commerce’s Uniform Customs and Practice of Documentary Credits. UCP 500, Art. 20(b), provides that:
Unless otherwise stipulated in the Credit, banks will also accept as an original document(s), a document(s) produced or appearing to have been produced:
  • (i) by reprographic, automated or computerised systems;
  • (ii) as carbon copies;
provided that it is marked as original, and, where necessary, appears to be signed. A document may be signed by handwriting, by facsimile signature, by perforated signature, by stamp, by symbol, or by any other mechanical or electronic method of authentication.
Article 20(b) and its predecessor (UCP 400, Art. 22(c)) have been considered on two occasions by the Court of Appeal, in Glencore v. Bank of China 2 and Kredietbank Antwerp v. Midland Bank Plc .3 The two decisions left the law confused and the banking world


LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY

152

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.