We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Arbitration Law Monthly RSS feed

Dispute resolution clauses: jurisdiction and admissibility

Online Published Date : 13 June 2022 | Appeared in issue: Vol 22 No 01 - 17 December 2021

In C v D [2021] HKCFI 1474, Godfrey Lam J in the Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance has confirmed the distinction drawn in recent cases in England and Singapore between jurisdiction and admissibility. The effect of the decision is that any dispute as to whether the conditions precedent to arbitration laid down in a dispute resolution clause is for the tribunal and not for the court to resolve.

Enforcement of arbitration awards: constitution of the tribunal

Online Published Date : 13 June 2022 | Appeared in issue: Vol 22 No 01 - 17 December 2021

In Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Co [2021] FCAFC 110, the Federal Full Court of Australia refused to enforce an arbitration award made in Qatar. The Full Court, consisting of Allsop CJ and Middleton and Stewart JJ, held that the fact that the tribunal had been appointed by the Qatar court did not preclude a finding by the enforcing court that the appointment was contrary to the parties’ agreement.

Enforcement of arbitration awards: jurisdictional defences

Online Published Date : 13 June 2022 | Appeared in issue: Vol 22 No 01 - 17 December 2021

The decision of the Supreme Court in Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48, upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal to refuse recognition and enforcement of an award made in Paris, is a crucial one on the interpretation of various elements of the Arbitration Act 1996 in its implementation of the New York Convention. The substantive issue was whether the jurisdictional question was to be determined by English or French law, but the Supreme Court made important observations on the manner in which jurisdictional challenges to enforcement are to be determined.